Premium
The results of total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma in a district general hospital before the era of surgical specialization
Author(s) -
Saha S.,
Booth M. I.,
Dehn T. C. B.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
colorectal disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.029
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1463-1318
pISSN - 1462-8910
DOI - 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2002.00285.x
Subject(s) - medicine , total mesorectal excision , stoma (medicine) , surgery , anastomosis , colorectal cancer , general surgery , rectal carcinoma , cancer
Objective To evaluate the results of rectal cancer surgery performed by a gastrointestinal surgeon in a district general hospital prior to the introduction of specialization, and to compare these to the targets set by the Royal College of Surgeons for specialist units. Methods Data collection in 73 consecutive patients (prospective in 53) undergoing elective excisional surgery (sphincter conserving in 77%) for rectal cancer. While adjuvant radio/chemotherapy and pathological assessment evolved over the study period, a standardized surgical technique (total mesorectal excision) was used in all patients. Results Observed (and recommended) outcome measures were operative mortality 4.1% (<5), anastomotic leak 6.2% (<8), wound infection 2.7% (< 10), pelvic recurrence after curative resection 9.6% (< 10). Temporary defunctioning stomas were used in 32/48 (66.7%) of patients. Other complications, currently without recommended outcomes, were erectile dysfunction (13%), stoma related (7.1%) urinary retention (4.1%), urinary incontinence (2.7%) and benign anastomotic stricture (2.7%). Conclusion All treatment outcome criteria were met. Trained gastrointestinal surgeons outside the setting of a specialist unit can achieve good results with acceptable complication rates.