Premium
Combined Use of Morphology Discrimination, Sudden Onset, and Stability as Discriminating Algorithms in Single Chamber Cardioverter Defibrillators
Author(s) -
BORIANI GIUSEPPE,
OCCHETTA ERALDO,
PISTIS GIANFRANCO,
MENOZZI CARLO,
JORFIDA MARCELLA,
SERMASI SERGIO,
PAGANI MASSIMO,
GASPARINI GIANNI,
MUSSO GIACOMO,
DALL'ACQUA ALBERTO,
BIFFI MAURO,
BRANZI ANGELO
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.01357.x
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiology , sinus rhythm , qrs complex , sudden death , atrial fibrillation
BORIANI, G., et al. : Combined Use of Morphology Discrimination, Sudden Onset, and Stability as Discriminating Algorithms in Single Chamber Cardioverter Defibrillators. Morphology Discrimination (MD) is a rhythm discriminator based on QRS morphology analysis that can be combined with other discriminators like Stability, with or without Sinus Interval History (SIH) and Sudden Onset. Thirty‐five patients implanted with a St. Jude Medical single chamber ICD were evaluated during exercise testing, during induced AF, and during follow‐up for 14 ± 5 months . At exercise testing (60 episodes detected) MD had a specificity (SP) of 96.7% and Sudden Onset a SP of 91.7%; during induced AF (25 episodes) both MD and Stability had a SP of 96.0%. The diagnostic performance on spontaneous arrhythmias was as follows: for ventricular tachycardia (126 episodes) a sensitivity (SE) of 94.4% for MD, 92.1% for Sudden Onset, 89.7% for Stability without SIH and 79.4% for Stability + SIH; for sinus tachycardia (44 episodes) a SP of 86.4% for MD, 97.7% for Sudden Onset, 2.3% for Stability and of 95.5% for Stability + SIH. For AF (165 cases) a SP of 67.9% for MD, 69.1% for Stability and 90.3% for Stability + SIH, 44.8% for Sudden Onset. Use of MD alone provided a SE of 94.4% and a SP of 71.4% for spontaneous arrhythmias and combined use of the discriminators in a “2 of 3” diagnostic logic implied a SP of 90.9% with maintenance of 96.0% of SE. In single chamber ICDs a wide range of SE/SP ratios may be obtained by use of multiple discriminators, but use of the algorithm in a 2 of 3 diagnostic logic may achieve a SP of 90.9% and a SE of 96.0%.