Premium
Internal Atrial Defibrillation During Electrophysiological Studies and Focal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Procedures
Author(s) -
KARCH MARTIN R.,
SCHMIEDER SEBASTIAN,
NDREPEPA GJIN,
SCHNEIDER MICHAEL A.E.,
ZRENNER BERNHARD,
SCHMITT CLAUS
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
pacing and clinical electrophysiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.686
H-Index - 101
eISSN - 1540-8159
pISSN - 0147-8389
DOI - 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.01464.x
Subject(s) - medicine , electrophysiology , atrial fibrillation , cardiology , sinus rhythm , cardioversion , defibrillation , ablation , catheter ablation , atrial flutter , electrophysiology study , anesthesia
KARCH, M.R., et al. : Internal Atrial Defibrillation During Electrophysiological Studies and Focal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Procedures. Induction of sustained AF during electrophysiological studies requires electrical cardioversion to restore sinus rhythm for continuation of the electrophysiological study and mapping procedure. The study included 104 consecutive patients ( age 59 ± 12 years, 74 men ), who were in stable sinus rhythm at the beginning of the electrophysiological study, underwent internal atrial defibrillation (IAD) of AF ( > 15 minutes ) that was induced during electrophysiological study. In 21 patients, AF was regarded to be the clinical problem (group I), and in the remaining 83 patients other arrhythmias represented the primary target of the electrophysiological study (group II). A 7.5 Fr cardioversion catheter (EP Medical) equipped with a distal array was used and placed in the left pulmonary artery and a proximal array of the same size was located along the lateral right atrial wall. All patients were successfully cardioverted with a mean energy of 6.2 ± 4.0 J. In 18 (78%) of 21 group I patients and in 12 (14%) of 81 group II patients, AF recurred 3.7 ± 3.4 and 2.4 ± 1.4 times during electrophysiological study, respectively. The IAD shock did not suppress focal activity, thus the mapping of atrial foci responsible for AF could be continued even after several IADs. No IAD related complications occurred during the study. In conclusion, (1) IAD can be safely and successfully performed during electrophysiological study without using narcotic drugs or high electric energies; (2) IAD does not suppress focal activity; and (3) even if AF recurs frequently during the electrophysiological study, IAD can be performed several times without significant time delay.