z-logo
Premium
Propofol as a sole agent for paediatric day care diagnostic ophthalmic procedures: comparison with halothane anaesthesia
Author(s) -
Madan Rashmi,
Kapoor Indu,
Balachander S.,
Kathirvel S.,
Kaul H. L.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
pediatric anesthesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.704
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1460-9592
pISSN - 1155-5645
DOI - 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00741.x
Subject(s) - medicine , propofol , anesthesia , sedation , halothane , general anaesthesia , bolus (digestion) , surgery
Background : Our aim was to study the feasibility of total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol in spontaneously breathing children undergoing ophthalmic procedures. Methods : Fifty‐five children (aged 6 months to 5 years) were randomly allocated to receive either propofol bolus (until loss of eyelash reflex) followed by infusion [group P ( n =29)] or halothane 3–4% for induction, followed by 1–2% in 70% nitrous oxide and oxygen via face mask [group H ( n =28)]. Dose for induction and maintenance, intraoperative adverse events, time to recovery (on an Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale, 5 at each level) and duration of procedure were recorded. All children in both groups, were anaesthetized successfully. Results : 4.0 ± 0.7 mg·kg –1 and 5.1 ± 1.0 mg·kg –1 of propofol were required for loss of eyelash reflex and tolerance of the ophthalmic speculum, respectively. An infusion rate of 8.3 ± 1.7 mg·kg –1 ·h –1 was needed for maintenance of anaesthesia; 3.4 ± 0.5%, 3.6 ± 0.4% and 1.4 ± 0.4% halothane was needed for induction, tolerance of the eye speculum and maintenance of anaesthesia, respectively. Induction and recovery were significantly faster with halothane compared with propofol [induction – 38.3 ± 6.6 s (group H)/60.9 ± 15.2 s (group P) ( P  < 0.001); recovery 12.8 ± 4.6 min (group H)/27.0 ± 23.3 min (group P) ( P  < 0.001)]. Apnoea, coughing and breath‐holding were seen only in group H. Group P had significantly higher incidence of involuntary movements (minor degree) ( n =6) ( P  < 0.01). Conclusions : Propofol is a feasible option for paediatric diagnostic ophthalmic procedures with the advantage over halothane of providing complete access to the eye.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here