Premium
Differential behavioural sensitization to intermittent morphine treatment in alcohol‐preferring AA and alcohol‐avoiding ANA rats: role of mesolimbic dopamine
Author(s) -
Ojanen Sami,
Koistinen Meri,
Bäckström Pia,
Kankaanpää Aino,
Tuomainen Päivi,
Hyytiä Petri,
Kiianmaa Kalervo
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
european journal of neuroscience
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.346
H-Index - 206
eISSN - 1460-9568
pISSN - 0953-816X
DOI - 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02589.x
Subject(s) - morphine , nucleus accumbens , sensitization , neurochemical , dopamine , pharmacology , opioid , saline , endocrinology , medicine , chemistry , anesthesia , psychology , neuroscience , receptor
Alcohol‐preferring AA (Alko Alcohol) and alcohol‐avoiding ANA (Alko Non‐Alcohol) rats have well‐documented differences in their voluntary ethanol consumption and brain opioidergic systems. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether these rat lines differ in their susceptibility to morphine‐induced behavioural and neurochemical sensitization. The rats were given 15 injections of morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) or saline every other day. Locomotor activity and release of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens were monitored after a challenge with additional morphine injections (10 mg/kg) 1 and 5 weeks after withdrawal from the repeated treatment. Morphine increased locomotion more in the previously morphine‐treated rats than in the saline‐treated controls. Furthermore, AA rats were more sensitive to this effect of morphine than ANA rats. Accumbal morphine‐induced dopamine release was significantly higher in the morphine‐treated AA than ANA rats after the first challenge injection 1 week from withdrawal, but no differences were observed after the second challenge. The brain and plasma concentrations of morphine were similar among the lines suggesting that the differences in the effects of morphine cannot be explained in terms of differential pharmacokinetics of morphine in these lines. These data show that AA rats are more susceptible to morphine‐induced behavioural sensitization than ANA rats. Furthermore, it suggests that mesolimbic dopamine has at best only a transient role in the expression of opioid‐induced behavioural sensitization. The relationship between the mechanisms underlying the differential sensitivity of these rat lines to the effects of repeated morphine and voluntary ethanol drinking remains to be determined.