z-logo
Premium
Snapshot of acute asthma: treatment and outcome of patients with acute asthma treated in Australian emergency departments
Author(s) -
Kelly A.M.,
Powell C.,
Kerr D.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
internal medicine journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.596
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1445-5994
pISSN - 1444-0903
DOI - 10.1046/j.1445-5994.2003.00469.x
Subject(s) - medicine , asthma , acute severe asthma , emergency department , snapshot (computer storage) , emergency medicine , intensive care medicine , medical emergency , respiratory disease , psychiatry , lung , computer science , operating system
Aims: To characterize presentations due to acute asthma at Australian emergency departments (ED), including their severity, treatment and disposition. Methods: This prospective, observational study involved 38 departments of emergency medicine throughout ­Australia participating in the Snapshot of Asthma Study Group project 2000 and 2001. Data were collected for patients presenting with acute asthma between 21 August 2000 and 3 September 2000, and 20 August 2001 and 2 September 2001 and included demographics, severity classification, treatment and disposition. Results: There were 1340 acute asthma presentations in the study periods. Of these presentations, 67% were for children aged <15 years. Asthma severity (according to the Australian National Asthma Guidelines classifi­cation) was ‘mild’ in 49% of cases; ‘moderate’ in 45% of cases; and ‘severe’ in 6% of cases. Treatment administered included: (i) salbutamol to 90%, (ii) ipratropium bromide to 59% and (iii) corticosteroids to 71%. Only six patients received aminophylline. Spacer use for sal­butamol was rare (1%) in adults and only moderate (43%) in children. Sixty‐five percent of patients were discharged home from the ED. Less than 1% of patients required ventilatory assistance, of which half was provided non‐invasively. One percent of patients were admitted to the intensive‐care unit or high‐dependency unit. Conclusion: Overall adherence to treatment guidelines was good. There appears to be underuse of spacers and corticosteroids in some groups and overuse of ipra­tropium bromide. The majority of patients are treated and discharged from the ED. (Intern Med J 2003; 33: 406−413)

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here