Premium
Audit of the management of suspected giant cell arteritis in a large teaching hospital
Author(s) -
Dalbeth N.,
Lynch N.,
McLean L.,
McQueen F.,
Zwi J.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
internal medicine journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.596
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1445-5994
pISSN - 1444-0903
DOI - 10.1046/j.1445-5994.2002.00225.x
Subject(s) - medicine , prednisone , giant cell arteritis , biopsy , osteoporosis , audit , rheumatology , retrospective cohort study , surgery , pediatrics , vasculitis , disease , management , economics
Abstract Background : The diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA) is often confirmed by an early temporal artery (TA) biopsy of adequate length. Treatment of this condition with high‐dose corticosteroids may be associated with significant morbidity, including osteoporosis. Aim : To audit current management of patients with suspected GCA at Auckland Healthcare, a large teaching hospital. Methods : We performed a retrospective chart review of all TA biopsies from January 1996 to June 2000. A total of 117 biopsies from 111 patients was audited. Of these patients, 37/111 (33%) had a final clinical diagnosis of GCA (GCA patients). The areas of interest for audit were waiting time for TA biopsy, length of sample, initial corticosteroid therapy and osteoporosis prophylaxis. Results : The mean waiting time for biopsy for all patients was 5.6 days (range 0−42 days). Thistime varied from 9.3 days for rheumatology patients to 2.6 days for ophthalmology patients ( P = 0.003). Only 44/117 (37.6%) specimens measured more than 10 mm. For GCA patients, the median initial oral prednisone dose was 60 mg/day. Osteoporosis prophylaxis was prescribed in 24/37 (65%) GCA patients, most commonly cyclical etidronate. Conclusions : There is significant variation in the management of GCA within our institution. This audit has highlighted several areas where improvement could be made, particularly in streamlining the process of obtaining TA biopsy and in promoting the use of osteoporosis prophylaxis. (Intern Med J 2002; 32: 315−319)