Premium
Sex‐ratio variation among Arisaema species with different patterns of gender diphasy
Author(s) -
Richardson Charles R.,
Clay Keith
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
plant species biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.419
H-Index - 36
eISSN - 1442-1984
pISSN - 0913-557X
DOI - 10.1046/j.1442-1984.2001.00058.x
Subject(s) - plant reproductive morphology , biology , sex change , inflorescence , sex ratio , reproduction , zoology , ecology , demography , population , fishery , sociology , fish <actinopterygii>
Arisaema species exhibit gender diphasy, or sex change, where individual plants produce either male, monoecious or female inflorescences depending on their size. Three basic sex‐change patterns have been described in Arisaema . Type I species change between male and monoecious phases, type II species change between male, monoecious and female phases, while type III species change between male and female phases. Theoretical models suggest that sex ratios should be biased toward males, the sex with the lowest cost of reproduction. The goal of this study was to examine sex‐ratio variation among Arisaema species that differ in sex‐change patterns. Data from an extensive literature review, consisting of all available studies reporting Arisaema sex ratios, were combined with data from extensive field surveys of Arisaema dracontium and Arisaema triphyllum in southern Indiana, USA. This data set contains nearly 30 000 plants from 12 species. All species conformed to either the type I or type III pattern of sex change. There was little evidence for a distinct type II pattern of sex change, given that plants with monoecious inflorescences were rare relative to plants with pistillate inflorescences. The mean sex ratio in type I species (79.9% male) was significantly greater than in type III species (63.7% male). The data are consistent with the prediction that type I species are likely to have greater costs associated with female reproduction. We suggest that all Arisaema species have similar patterns of floral development, but differ in their ontogenetic patterns for male and female flowering.