z-logo
Premium
Expression of urokinase‐type plasminogen activator, urokinase‐type plasminogen activator receptor, and plasminogen activator inhibitor‐1 and ‐2 in hepatocellular carcinoma
Author(s) -
Zhou Li,
Hayashi Yoshitake,
Itoh Takashi,
Wang Weiping,
Rui Jing an,
Itoh Hiroshi
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
pathology international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.73
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1440-1827
pISSN - 1320-5463
DOI - 10.1046/j.1440-1827.2000.01059.x
Subject(s) - urokinase receptor , plasminogen activator , immunohistochemistry , cirrhosis , hepatocellular carcinoma , pathology , urokinase , liver cancer , cancer research , cancer , cancer cell , medicine , chemistry , biology
It has become more and more clear in recent decades that the plasminogen activation system, which includes urokinase‐type plasminogen activator (uPA), urokinase‐type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)‐1 and PAI‐2, plays a very important role in the aggressiveness of cancer. Using immunohistochemistry and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), the expression of these four components of the uPA system was analyzed in 19 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 18 cases of the adjacent non‐cancer tissues which all had chronic active hepatitis with liver fibrosis or liver cirrhosis. Four cases of normal liver tissues, as controls for immunohistochemical stains, were obtained from the hepatectomized liver of patients with metastatic cancer in the liver. The positive rates of uPA, uPAR, PAI‐1 and PAI‐2 for immunohistochemical stains in cancer tissues were 78.9, 68.4, 57.9 and 31.6%, respectively. Positive signals were mainly distributed in the cytoplasm of the cancer and in stromal cells. Moreover, the strong stains were chiefly located in the invasive front of the cancer cells. No specific stain was detected in four cases of normal liver tissues. In ELISA, there were significant differences between cancer and non‐cancer tissues in concentration of uPA, uPAR and PAI‐1 ( P < 0.0003, 0.0024 and 0.01, respectively), but there was no significant difference in that of PAI‐2 ( P = 0.37). These results suggest that uPA, uPAR and PAI‐1 are related to invasion of HCC.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here