z-logo
Premium
[ 13 C]‐Urea breath test without prior fasting and without test meal is accurate for the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection in Chinese
Author(s) -
Ng Fook Hong,
Lai Kam Chuen,
Wong Benjamin Chun Yu,
Wong Wai Man,
Wong Siu Yin,
Chow Kai Chiu,
Yuen Siu Tsan,
Leung Suet Yi,
Lam Shiu Kum
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.214
H-Index - 130
eISSN - 1440-1746
pISSN - 0815-9319
DOI - 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02833.x
Subject(s) - medicine , breath test , gastroenterology , meal , helicobacter pylori , campylobacter , gold standard (test) , urea breath test , population , helicobacter pylori infection , environmental health , biology , bacteria , genetics
Background and Aim: Conventional [ 13 C]‐urea breath test ([ 13 C]‐UBT) requires prior fasting and a test meal, which theoretically improves the accuracy of the test. However, recent studies have suggested that prior fasting and test meal may not be essential. We aimed to determine the accuracy of a new [ 13 C]‐UBT protocol without fasting in Chinese. Methods: Dyspeptic patients referred for upper endoscopy were recruited. The gold standard for Helicobacter pylori infection was the combination of Campylobacter ‐like organism (CLO) test and histology. Group I ( n = 213) patients underwent [ 13 C]‐UBT with prior fasting and with citrate acid test meal. Group II ( n = 123) patients underwent [ 13 C]‐UBT without prior fasting but with test meal. Group III ( n = 90) patients underwent [ 13 C]‐UBT without prior fasting and without test meal. Results: The highest accuracy for groups I, II and III was 96.7, 95.1 and 95.5% using a cut‐off value of 5.0, 5.5 and 3.5, respectively. The sensitivities and specificities were 97.4 and 95.8% in group I, 93.3 and 96.8% in group II, and 96.5 and 93.9% in group III, respectively. Conclusion: The [ 13 C]‐UBT protocols without prior fasting and either with or without test meal produce highly accurate and reliable results in the Chinese population.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here