Premium
INSURANCE AND THE RISK OF RUPTURED APPENDIX IN THE ADULT
Author(s) -
Wong S. W.,
Haxhimolla H.,
Grieve D. A.,
Fisher R.,
Keogh G.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
australian and new zealand journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.111
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1445-2197
pISSN - 0004-8682
DOI - 10.1046/j.1440-1622.1999.01482.x
Subject(s) - medicine , perforation , appendicitis , odds ratio , exact test , confidence interval , incidence (geometry) , appendix , risk factor , logistic regression , retrospective cohort study , surgery , paleontology , materials science , physics , biology , optics , punching , metallurgy
Background : Disparities in medical care related to the insurance status of patients have been reported. A retrospective analysis was performed to examine the insurance‐related differences in the risk of appendiceal perforation in the Prince of Wales Hospital (POWH), New South Wales. Methods : Computerized data of 1179 patient years who had a diagnosis of appendicitis and were admitted to the POWH over the preceding 10 years were examined. The outcome measure was appendiceal perforation. Patient variables examined were insurance status, sex, age, and socio‐economic status (SES). Three hundred patients over the same period were identified who had an appendicectomy but not appendicitis. Multiple logistic regression and Fisher’s exact test were used for statistical analysis. Results : The overall perforation rate in 1179 patients was 17%. The only factor that was related to an increased risk of perforation was age over 50 years (odds ratio (OR)1.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04–2.53). Sex, insurance status or SES were not associated with a higher risk of perforation. The overall rate of negative appendicectomy was 20% (300 of 1479 patients), and the rate was higher in the uninsured patients (22 vs 17%, P = 0.014, Fisher’s exact test). Conclusions : Lack of health insurance was not associated with an increased incidence of appendiceal perforation at the POWH. Age over 50 years was identified as the only risk factor for appendiceal perforation. The lower negative appendicectomy rate in the insured group may be because of better diagnostic ability of consultants compared to registrars.