Premium
Rural practice evaluation: how do rural physicians evaluate their working conditions?
Author(s) -
Matsumoto Masatoshi,
Inoue Kazuo,
Kajii Eiji
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
australian journal of rural health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.48
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1440-1584
pISSN - 1038-5282
DOI - 10.1046/j.1440-1584.2001.00343.x
Subject(s) - government (linguistics) , family medicine , rural area , rural health , quality (philosophy) , medicine , nursing , job satisfaction , psychology , social psychology , linguistics , philosophy , epistemology , pathology
Evaluating the quality of rural doctors’ working conditions is essential for retaining physicians in rural areas. We carried out a trial to investigate those aspects of working conditions that are important to rural physicians and with which aspects they are satisfied or dissatisfied. Questionnaires were mailed to 204 doctors who were working in rural clinics in Japan. The professional conditions of rural clinic practices were classified into 17 items. The doctors were then asked to evaluate the importance of and degree of satisfaction with each item. Among the 17 items, the clinic’s equipment, the municipal government’s attitude and the base hospital were evaluated to be more important than the overall average. With regard to satisfaction, the distance to major cities, the municipal government’s attitude and locum availability were rated significantly lower than that overall. There were some items where there was a discrepancy between the importance and the degree of satisfaction. Identifying these discrepancies may contribute to creating an environment that will raise the level of rural physicians’ satisfaction.