Premium
Use of the Sperm Quality Analyzer (SQA II‐C) for the Assessment of Dog Sperm Quality
Author(s) -
Rijsselaere T,
Van Soom A,
Maes D,
De Kruif A
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
reproduction in domestic animals
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.546
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1439-0531
pISSN - 0936-6768
DOI - 10.1046/j.1439-0531.2002.00356.x
Subject(s) - sperm , sperm quality , semen , sperm motility , andrology , repeatability , semen analysis , semen quality , biology , motility , coefficient of variation , chemistry , chromatography , medicine , infertility , genetics , pregnancy
Contents In the present study, an automated system for sperm analysis, the Sperm Quality Analyzer (SQA II‐C), was tested as a potential tool for the assessment of dog sperm quality. In the first experiment the device displayed a good repeatability of measurements for semen of medium and high quality, as evidenced by a low coefficient of variance (CV; 0.08), whereas a high CV (0.46) was obtained for one dog with semen of inferior quality. In the second experiment, seven different sperm concentrations (25–300 ×10 6 /ml), obtained by dilutions in Hepes‐TALP medium were stored for 48 h at room temperature. A concentration dependent increase in sperm motility index (SMI) was shown, reaching a plateau at 150×10 6 spermatozoa/ml. For all sperm concentrations, the SMI value decreased significantly after 24 h, indicating the importance of sperm motility for SMI values. For sperm concentrations lower than 150×10 6 /ml, highly significant correlations [r=0.80;p<0.05] were established between SMI values on one hand and sperm concentration, and semen parameters expressing the overall semen sample quality on the other hand (experiment 3) while non‐significant or low correlations were found between SMI values and other individual sperm parameters. In experiment 4, significantly high correlations (r=0.97) were found between mean SMI values and post‐thaw motility and progressive motility assessed subjectively. In conclusion, our study indicates that both motility and concentration largely influence SMI values and that the SQA II‐C saturates at 150×10 6 fresh spermatozoa/ml. In our opinion, the SQA II‐C may be a useful and objective device to assess the post‐thaw motility of dog sperm.