Premium
Stability Indices for Weed Management Systems in Forage Oat ( Avena sativa L.)
Author(s) -
Singh K.,
Shukla G. P.,
Rawat C. R.,
Kumar Sunil,
Hazra C. R.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal of agronomy and crop science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.095
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1439-037X
pISSN - 0931-2250
DOI - 10.1046/j.1439-037x.2001.00520.x
Subject(s) - agronomy , forage , weed control , avena , crop , weed , mathematics , crop yield , lolium multiflorum , digitaria sanguinalis , cropping system , biology
A set of integrated weed management systems was assessed in forage oat ( Avena sativa L.), cv. Kent, to compare efficiencies inter se in terms of mean forage productivity over different locations and different years, and relative agronomic effectiveness. Results for seven weed management systems were obtained for three consecutive years, i.e. 1995–96, 1996–97 and 1997–98, at five locations of the Indian subcontinent. Two systems – use of weeder‐cum‐mulcher at the 3‐ and 6‐week crop stages (WCS) and use of weeder‐cum‐mulcher at the 4 WCS plus application of 2, 4‐D at 0.37 kg a.i. ha –1 at 6 WCS – were found to be effective and consistent over locations from year to year and over years from location to location. Pooled analysis over years and locations showed manual weeding at 4 WCS plus application of 2, 4‐D at 0.37 kg a.i. ha –1 at 6 WCS, on the one hand, and use of weeder‐cum‐mulcher at 3 WCS plus manual weeding at 5 WCS, on the other, to have equal efficiencies and to be more beneficial than the other treatments. Recommendation of the latter system is of particular interest as this system merely involves mechanical operations which provide the benefits of soil mulching and carry no risk of biotoxicity due to herbicides in crop plants or adverse effects on soil through uninterrupted use of chemicals.