z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Characterization of cis ‐acting elements in the promoter of the mouse metallothionein‐3 gene
Author(s) -
Faraonio Raffaella,
Moffatt Pierre,
LaRochelle Olivier,
Schipper Hyman M.,
SArnaud René,
Séguin Carl
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
european journal of biochemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1432-1033
pISSN - 0014-2956
DOI - 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01167.x
Subject(s) - biology , microbiology and biotechnology , repressor , gene expression , gene , chromatin , regulation of gene expression , regulatory sequence , transcription (linguistics) , epigenetics , promoter , dna methylation , genetics , linguistics , philosophy
The metallothionein ( MT )3 gene is expressed predominantly in the brain and the organs of the reproductive system, and fails to respond to metal ions in vivo . A CTG repeat was proposed to function as a potential repressor element in nonpermissive cells, and a sequence similar to the JC virus silencer element was found to function as a negative element in permissive primary astrocytes. The objective of this study was to characterize further the mechanisms governing cell‐type specific MT‐3 gene transcription. We searched for a suitable cell line expressing the MT‐3 gene to be used for determination of MT‐3 promoter tissue specificity, and showed that MT‐3 expression is activated during neuroectodermal differentiation of P19 cells induced by retinoic acid to levels similar to those found in whole brain. Deletion of the CTG repeat or of the JC virus silencer did not promote MT‐3 promoter activity in nonpermissive cells, or enhance expression in permissive cells. We identified MT‐3 promoter sequences interacting with liver and brain nuclear proteins, as assayed by DNase I footprinting analyses and electrophoretic mobility shift assay, and assessed the role of these sequences in the regulation of MT‐3 expression by cotransfection experiments. We generated stable transfectants in permissive C6 and nonpermissive NIH‐3T3 cells, and analysed the methylation status of the MT‐3 gene. These studies show that regulation of tissue‐specific MT‐3 gene expression does not appear to involve a repressor, and suggest that other mechanisms such as chromatin organization and epigenetic modifications could account for the absence of MT‐3 gene transcription in nonpermissive cells.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here