Open AccessA model of a gp120 V3 peptide in complex with an HIV‐neutralizing antibody based on NMR and mutant cycle‐derived constraints
Author(s) -
Zvi Anat,
Tugarinov Vitali,
Faiman Gabriel A.,
Horovitz Am,
Anglister Jacob
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
european journal of biochemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1432-1033
pISSN - 0014-2956
DOI - 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01055.x
Subject(s) - chemistry , peptide , v3 loop , mutagenesis , stereochemistry , immunoglobulin light chain , amino acid , monoclonal antibody , aromatic amino acids , mutant , nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy , antibody , side chain , glycoprotein , peptide sequence , biochemistry , biology , gene , organic chemistry , immunology , polymer
The 0.5β monoclonal antibody is a very potent strain‐specific HIV‐neutralizing antibody raised against gp120, the envelope glycoprotein of HIV‐1. This antibody recognizes the V3 loop of gp120, which is a major neutralizing determinant of the virus. The antibody–peptide interactions, involving aromatic and negatively charged residues of the antibody 0.5β, were studied by NMR and double‐mutant cycles. A deuterated V3 peptide and a Fab containing deuterated aromatic amino acids were used to assign these interactions to specific V3 residues and to the amino acid type and specific chain of the antibody by NOE difference spectroscopy . Electrostatic interactions between negatively charged residues of the antibody Fv and peptide residues were studied by mutagenesis of both antibody and peptide residues and double‐mutant cycles. Several interactions could be assigned unambiguously: F96(L) of the antibody interacts with Pro13 of the peptide, H52(H) interacts with Ile7, Ile9 and Gln10 and D56(H) interacts with Arg11. The interactions of the light‐chain tyrosines with Pro13 and Gly14 could be assigned to either Y30a(L) and Y32(L), respectively, or Y32(L) and Y49(L), respectively. Three heavy‐chain tyrosines interact with Ile7, Ile20 and Phe17. Several combinations of assignments involving Y32(H), Y53(H), Y96(H) and Y100a(H) may satisfy the NMR and mutagenesis constraints, and therefore at this stage the interactions of the heavy‐chain tyrosines were not taken into account. The unambiguous assignments [F96(L), H52(H) and D56(H)] and the two possible assignments of the light‐chain tyrosines were used to dock the peptide into the antibody‐combining site. The peptide converges to a unique position within the binding site, with the RGPG loop pointing into the center of the groove formed by the antibody complementary determining regions while retaining the β‐hairpin conformation and the type‐VI RGPG turn [Tugarinov, V., Zvi, A., Levy, R. & Anglister, J. (1999) Nat. Struct. Biol. 6 , 331–335].