z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Structure of the O polysaccharide and immunochemical relationships between the lipopolysaccharides of Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato and pathovar maculicola
Author(s) -
Knirel Yuriy A.,
Ovod Vladimir V.,
Zdorovenko Galina M.,
Gvozdyak Rostislav I.,
Krohn Kai J.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
european journal of biochemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1432-1033
pISSN - 0014-2956
DOI - 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2580657.x
Subject(s) - pathovar , pseudomonas syringae , stereochemistry , heteronuclear molecule , chemistry , polysaccharide , nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy , rhamnose , biology , pseudomonas , pseudomonadaceae , biochemistry , bacteria , genetics , gene
O polysaccharides (OPS) of the lipopolysaccharides (LPS) of Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato GSPB 483 and pathovar maculicola IMV 381 were studied by 1 H‐NMR and 13 C‐NMR spectroscopy, including two‐dimensional COSY, rotating‐frame NOE spectroscopy (ROESY), and H‐detected 1 H, 13 C heteronuclear multiple‐quantum coherence (HMQC) experiments. The OPS from both strains were shown to be chemically identical. Two structurally different types of repeating units (O repeats 1 and 2 ) were elucidated in each OPS. The minor O repeat is a pentasaccharide having the structure 2 . The same structure has been reported earlier for some other OPS of P. syringae . The major O repeat is a hexasaccharide with the novel structure 1 which is distinguished from 2 by the presence of the second lateral residue of 3‐acetamido‐3,6‐dideoxy‐ D ‐galactose ( D ‐Fuc3NAc) and by a different position of substitution of one of the L ‐rhamnose (Rha) residues in the backbone. α‐ D ‐Fuc p 3NAcα‐ D ‐Fuc p 3NAc11↓↓33←2)‐α‐ L ‐Rha p ‐(1←2)‐α‐ L ‐Rha p ‐(1←3)‐α‐ L ‐Rha p ‐(1←3)‐α‐ L ‐Rha p ‐(1← 1 α‐ D ‐Fuc p 3NAc1↓3←2)‐α‐ L ‐Rha p ‐(1←3)‐α‐ L ‐Rha p ‐(1←3)‐α‐ L ‐Rha p ‐(1←3)‐α‐ L ‐Rha p ‐(1← 2 Structural and serological diversity of OPS of strains belonging to P. syringae pv. tomato and pv. maculicola and phylogenetic relatedness of the strains are discussed.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here