Premium
Model of crop:weed competition applied to maize: Abutilon theophrasti interactions. II. Assessing the impact of climate: implications for economic thresholds
Author(s) -
Vanessa M. McDonald,
Ríha
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
weed research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.693
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1365-3180
pISSN - 0043-1737
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-3180.1999.00152.x
Subject(s) - weed , competition (biology) , edaphic , abutilon , weed control , growing season , crop , population , biology , agronomy , geography , environmental science , ecology , demography , sociology , soil water
The practical application of single‐season economic thresholds for post‐emergence weed control decisions has been frustrated by the impact of growing season, climate and edaphic factors on crop:weed interactions. Competition in a mixed plant community is a dynamic process that is contingent upon species‐specific growth characteristics and their expression based on environmental conditions. To address these issues, a modified version of the ALMANAC competition model was parameterized and run to simulate maize: Abutilon theophrasti competition with 30 years (1966–95) of historical climate data for a site in New York State. Simulations indicate that, when weeds do not emerge before maize, maize will only suffer substantial yield reductions from A. theophrasti competition in two out of every 10 years at this site. It is also evident that economic thresholds based solely on the level of weed infestation are inherently flawed. Long‐term simulation results suggest that estimates of early season water stress could be used as an independent tool for rationalizing post‐emergence control decisions. Shifting the focus from quantifying the infestation intensity of the weed population to assessing the competitive status of the maize crop indirectly with climate information may alleviate many of the problems commonly associated with threshold management strategies.