Premium
Causes of locomotor disability and need for orthopaedic devices in a heavily mined Taliban‐controlled province of Afghanistan: issues and challenges for public health managers
Author(s) -
François Isabelle,
Lambert MarieLaurence,
Salort Cécile,
Slypen Vincent,
Bertrand Françoise,
Tonglet René
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
tropical medicine and international health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.056
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 1365-3156
pISSN - 1360-2276
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-3156.1998.00246.x
Subject(s) - rehabilitation , medicine , poliomyelitis , public health , population , lower limb , physical therapy , orthopedic surgery , physical medicine and rehabilitation , pediatrics , surgery , environmental health , nursing
We conducted a locomotor disability survey on a heavily mined Taliban‐controlled province of Afghanistan to document the problem of locomotor disability and to assess the need for orthopaedic rehabilitation devices in a study population of 12065. Global prevalence of locomotor disability was 23/1000 (95% CI: 20–26). War‐related injuries were the leading cause of disability, affecting almost exclusively adult males. Leading causes of disability among women and children were medical and poliomyelitis. Devices most needed were lower limb ortheses (8.2 devices/1000 people; 95% CI: 5.9–10.4) and orthopaedic shoes (6.0/1000; 95% CI:4.1–8.0). The need for lower limb prostheses was less frequent (2.0/1000; 95% CI: 1.1–2.8). Most lower limb amputees (mainly victims of landmine injuries) were fitted with an artificial leg, while rehabilitation needs for other types of disability remained largely unmet. We estimated that it would take at least 3 years to provide enough orthopaedic shoes and 10 years for ortheses, whereas the need for lower limb prostheses could be met in less than 4 months. None of the 27 women with lower limb disability were equipped with an orthopaedic device, although this was the case for 31 of 89 men (35%). The problem of landmines should not divert attention from other causes of disability such as poliomyelitis or from other rehabilitation requirements. Immunization programmes and restoration of the public health infrastructure should be given high priority; rehabilitation services are largely insufficient and should be developed. Extreme gender difference in needs coverage is a matter of concern. Researching culturally sensitive strategies to tackle this problem should be a priority for donors and implementing agencies.