Premium
A tobacco matrix attachment region reduces the loss of transgene expression in the progeny of transgenic tobacco plants
Author(s) -
Ülker Bekir,
Allen George C.,
Thompson William F.,
Spiker Steven,
Weissinger Arthur K.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
the plant journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.058
H-Index - 269
eISSN - 1365-313X
pISSN - 0960-7412
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1999.00453.x
Subject(s) - transgene , biology , reporter gene , scaffold/matrix attachment region , transformation (genetics) , nicotiana tabacum , gene , genetics , genetically modified crops , gene expression , backcrossing , gus reporter system , microbiology and biotechnology , chromatin remodeling
Summary The RB7 matrix attachment region (MAR), when flanking a uidA ( GUS ) reporter gene, has been previously shown to increase uidA gene expression by 60‐fold in stably transformed tobacco suspension cell lines. We have now used the same co‐transformation procedure to determine the effect of flanking MARs on uidA gene expression in tobacco plants. The neomycin phosphotransferase selection gene and uidA reporter gene on separate plasmids were co‐transformed into seedlings by microprojectile bombardment. In primary transgenic plants, the average uidA expression in plants with MARs was twofold greater than in control plants without MARs, but there was no effect on variation of expression. GUS activity was not proportional to the number of integrated uidA transgenes over the entire range of copy numbers. However, in the lower part of the copy number range, MAR lines show a tendency for expression to increase with copy number. Transgene expression in backcross progenies of the MAR‐containing lines averaged threefold higher than in control progenies. MARs also reduced the loss of transgene expression in the BC 1 generation. Sixty‐three per cent of the 21 MAR‐containing primary transformants, but only 20% of the 14 control primary transformants, produced backcross progenies in which no loss of transgene expression was observed. These observations are discussed in the context of homology‐dependent gene silencing.