Premium
Interaction between powdery mildew and barley with mlo5 mildew resistance
Author(s) -
Lyngkjær M. F.,
Oslash;stergård H.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
plant pathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.928
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1365-3059
pISSN - 0032-0862
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-3059.1998.00234.x
Subject(s) - haustorium , powdery mildew , biology , hordeum vulgare , appressorium , mildew , inoculation , erysiphe graminis , host (biology) , botany , horticulture , poaceae , genetics
Powdery mildew infection of barley with the mlo5 barley powdery mildew resistance gene was examined, using near‐isogenic barley lines, with and without mlo5 resistance, and two near‐isogenic powdery mildew isolates, HL3/5 and GE3 with high (virulent) or low (avirulent) penetration efficiency on the resistant barley line. In all isolate–host combinations (except GE3 on the resistant barley line), frequency of haustorium formation increased significantly from zero at 11 h after inoculation to a maximum by 13 h, and there was no subsequent increase up to 24 h. In the susceptible barley line, 27% of appressoria from both isolates formed haustoria. Although this was significantly higher than the frequency of haustorium formation (18%) of HL3/5 on the resistant barley line, HL3/5 was much more successful than GE3 (frequency of haustorium formation less than 1%). The fact that HL3/5 did not possess a generally higher ability to penetrate successfully to form haustoria on the susceptible barley line, indicates that HL3/5 did not overcome the mlo5 resistance by being generally more vigorous. In the resistant barley line, papillae were larger than in the susceptible line; however, both isolates were associated with papillae of the same diameter at the time of penetration. We suggest that the mlo5 resistant barley line confers two different forms of resistance: isolate‐specific and isolate‐nonspecific.