Premium
No photosynthetic down‐regulation in sweetgum trees ( Liquidambar styraciflua L.) after three years of CO 2 enrichment at the Duke Forest FACE experiment
Author(s) -
Herrick J. D.,
Thomas R. B.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
plant, cell and environment
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.646
H-Index - 200
eISSN - 1365-3040
pISSN - 0140-7791
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00652.x
Subject(s) - liquidambar styraciflua , photosynthesis , botany , canopy , horticulture , rubisco , biology , photosynthetic capacity
Photosynthetic capacity and leaf properties of sun and shade leaves of overstorey sweetgum trees ( Liquidambar styraciflua L.) were compared over the first 3 years of growth in ambient or ambient + 200 μL L − 1 CO 2 at the Duke Forest Free Air CO 2 Enrichment (FACE) experiment. We were interested in whether photosynthetic down‐regulation to CO 2 occurred in sweetgum trees growing in a forest ecosystem, whether shade leaves down‐regulated to a greater extent than sun leaves, and if there was a seasonal component to photosynthetic down‐regulation. During June and September of each year, we measured net photosynthesis ( A ) versus the calculated intercellular CO 2 concentration ( C i ) in situ and analysed these response curves using a biochemical model that described the limitations imposed by the amount and activity of ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase ( Vc max ) and by the rate of ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate (RuBP) regeneration mediated by electron transport ( J max ). There was no evidence of photosynthetic down‐regulation to CO 2 in either sun or shade leaves of sweetgum trees over the 3 years of measurements. Elevated CO 2 did not significantly affect Vc max or J max . The ratio of Vc max to J max was relatively constant, averaging 2·12, and was not affected by CO 2 treatment, position in the canopy, or measurement period. Furthermore, CO 2 enrichment did not affect leaf nitrogen per unit leaf area ( N a ), chlorophyll or total non‐structural carbohydrates of sun or shade leaves. We did, however, find a strong relationship between N a and the modelled components of photosynthetic capacity, Vc max and J max . Our data over the first 3 years of this experiment corroborate observations that trees rooted in the ground may not exhibit symptoms of photosynthetic down‐regulation as quickly as tree seedlings growing in pots. There was a strong sustained enhancement of photosynthesis by CO 2 enrichment whereby light‐saturated net photosynthesis of sun leaves was stimulated by 63% and light‐saturated net photosynthesis of shade leaves was stimulated by 48% when averaged over the 3 years. This study suggests that this CO 2 enhancement of photosynthesis will be sustained in the Duke Forest FACE experiment as long as soil N availability keeps pace with photosynthetic and growth processes.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom