Premium
Response of the water status of soybean to changes in soil water potentials controlled by the water pressure in microporous tubes
Author(s) -
STEINBERG S. L.,
HENNINGER D. L.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
plant, cell and environment
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.646
H-Index - 200
eISSN - 1365-3040
pISSN - 0140-7791
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-46.x
Subject(s) - water potential , water content , water flow , hydraulic conductivity , soil water , macropore , transpiration , porosity , infiltration (hvac) , water transport , pore water pressure , soil science , environmental science , chemistry , materials science , geotechnical engineering , geology , composite material , mesoporous material , biochemistry , photosynthesis , catalysis
Water transport through a microporous tube‐soil‐plant system was investigated by measuring the response of soil and plant water status to step change reductions in the water pressure within the tubes. Soybeans were germinated and grown in a porous ceramic ‘soil’ at a porous tube water pressure of –0.5 kPa for 28 d. During this time, the soil matric potential was nearly in equilibrium with tube water pressure. Water pressure in the porous tubes was then reduced to either –1.0, –1.5 or –2.0 kPa. Sap flow rates, leaf conductance and soil, root and leaf water potentials were measured before and after this change. A reduction in porous tube water pressure from –0.5 to –1.0 or –1.5 kPa did not result in any significant change in soil or plant water status. A reduction in porous tube water pressure to –2.0 kPa resulted in significant reductions in sap flow, leaf conductance, and soil, root and leaf water potentials. Hydraulic conductance, calculated as the transpiration rate/ΔΨ between two points in the water transport pathway, was used to analyse water transport through the tube‐soil‐plant continuum. At porous tube water pressures of –0.5 to –1.5 kPa soil moisture was readily available and hydraulic conductance of the plant limited water transport. At –2.0 kPa, hydraulic conductance of the bulk soil was the dominant factor in water movement.