Premium
Motivation models fail to explain oviposition behaviour in the diamondback moth
Author(s) -
Monks Adrian,
Kelly Dave
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
physiological entomology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.693
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1365-3032
pISSN - 0307-6962
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-3032.2003.00333.x
Subject(s) - diamondback moth , biology , plutella , host (biology) , generalist and specialist species , zoology , ecology , larva , habitat
. It is widely accepted that previous experience and internal physiological factors (such as egg‐load) affect host‐plant discrimination during oviposition by phytophagous insects. However, there is some debate as to how these factors interact in a mechanistic sense to control acceptance. The role of learning and host deprivation in host acceptance by adult diamondback moths ( Plutella xylostella L.) was investigated. In the first experiment, we tested whether experience of a lower ranked host cabbage increased acceptance of a higher ranked host as predicted by a hierarchy threshold model. Moths trained on cabbage were over three times more likely to accept cabbage during testing than untrained moths. There was no effect of cabbage training on acceptance of cress, indicating that the effect of training was species‐specific. In a second experiment, designed to test the prediction of motivation models that insects become less discriminating when deprived of oviposition opportunities, depriving females of host plants for 2 nights significantly increased female egg‐load (×2.3). Host deprivation did not decrease discrimination between the preferred host cress and cabbage. Cabbage and cress plants were equally likely to have been accepted by nondeprived moths after 1 night of exposure, yet moths deprived of hosts for 2 nights strongly preferred cress when tested during the first 20 min of the scotophase. During this 20‐min period, previous host deprivation increased acceptance of host plants generally but did not decrease discrimination between hosts. These data contradict the expectation that there is an inverse relationship between host species discrimination and the failure of an insect to find hosts as found in existing oviposition acceptance models. As an alternative, the Incremental Acceptance Model of host acceptance behaviour is presented, in which responsiveness to a host is a function of the recent encounter rate with host‐specific stimuli, and the oviposition reflex is regulated by nonspecific cues such as egg‐load.