z-logo
Premium
Emerging and re‐emerging epidemic encephalitis: a tale of two viruses
Author(s) -
Wong K. T.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
neuropathology and applied neurobiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.538
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 1365-2990
pISSN - 0305-1846
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2990.2000.00256.x
Subject(s) - encephalitis , viral encephalitis , pathology , enterovirus 71 , immunology , pathogenesis , virology , encephalomyelitis , medicine , japanese encephalitis , virus , biology , enterovirus , multiple sclerosis
Two major epidemics of viral encephalitis occurred in Asia in 1997 and 1998. The first was a re‐emergence of neurovirulent strains of enterovirus 71, which caused severe encephalomyelitis in children in Malaysia, Taiwan and Japan, on a background of hand, foot and mouth disease. Necropsy studies of patients who died of enterovirus 71 infection showed severe perivascular cuffing, parenchymal inflammation and neuronophagia in the spinal cord, brainstem and diencephalon, and in focal areas in the cerebellum and cerebrum. Although no viral inclusions were detected, immunohistochemistry showed viral antigen in the neuronal cytoplasm. Inflammation was often more extensive than neuronal infection, suggesting that other factors, in addition to direct viral cytolysis, may be involved in tissue damage. The second epidemic of viral encephalitis was the result of a novel paramyxovirus called Nipah, which mainly involved pig handlers in Malaysia and Singapore. Pathological evidence suggested that the endothelium of small blood vessels in the central nervous system was particularly susceptible to infection. This led to disseminated endothelial damage and syncytium formation, vasculitis, thrombosis, ischaemia and microinfarction. However, there was also evidence of neuronal infection by the virus and this may also have contributed to the neurological dysfunction in Nipah encephalitis. Some patients who seemed to recover from the acute symptoms have been re‐admitted with clinical findings suggestive of relapsing encephalitis. As these two epidemics indicate, the emergence and re‐emergence of viral encephalitides continue to pose considerable challenges to the neuropathologist, in establishing the diagnosis and unravelling the pathogenesis of the neurological disease.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here