Premium
Nitrate and the GATA factor AreA are necessary for in vivo binding of NirA, the pathway‐specific transcriptional activator of Aspergillus nidulans
Author(s) -
Narendja Frank,
Goller Sabine P.,
Wolschek Markus,
Strauss Joseph
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
molecular microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.857
H-Index - 247
eISSN - 1365-2958
pISSN - 0950-382X
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02911.x
Subject(s) - aspergillus nidulans , biology , repressor , transactivation , inducer , binding site , transcription factor , transcription (linguistics) , nitrate reductase , biochemistry , promoter , operon , chromatin , genetics , intracellular , activator (genetics) , microbiology and biotechnology , gene , enzyme , gene expression , mutant , linguistics , philosophy
Summary In Aspergillus nidulans , the genes coding for nitrate reductase ( niaD ) and nitrite reductase ( niiA ), are transcribed divergently from a common promoter region of 1200 basepairs. We have previously characterized the relevant cis ‐acting elements for the two synergistically acting transcriptional activators NirA and AreA. We have further shown that AreA is constitutively bound to a central cluster of four GATA sites, and is involved in opening the chromatin structure over the promoter region thus making additional cis‐ acting binding sites accessible. Here we show that the asymmetric mode of NirA–DNA interaction determined in vitro is also found in vivo . Binding of the NirA transactivator is not constitutive as in other binuclear C6‐Zn 2 + ‐cluster proteins but depends on nitrate induction and, additionally, on the presence of a wild‐type areA allele. Dissecting the role of AreA further, we found that it is required for intracellular nitrate accumulation and therefore could indirectly exert its effect on NirA via inducer exclusion. We have tested this possibility in a strain accumulating nitrate in the absence of areA. We found that in such a strain the intracellular presence of inducer is not sufficient to promote either chromatin rearrangement or NirA binding, implying that both processes are directly dependent on AreA.