Premium
Cross‐regulation of competence pheromone production and export in the early control of transformation in Streptococcus pneumoniae
Author(s) -
Martin Bernard,
Prudhomme Marc,
Alloing Geneviève,
Granadel Chantal,
Claverys JeanPierre
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
molecular microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.857
H-Index - 247
eISSN - 1365-2958
pISSN - 0950-382X
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02187.x
Subject(s) - biology , operon , response regulator , mutant , gene , genetics , insertional mutagenesis , transposon mutagenesis , transposable element , histidine kinase , mutagenesis
Two operons, comAB and comCDE , play a key role in the co‐ordination of spontaneous competence development in cultures of Streptococcus pneumoniae . ComAB is required for export of the comC ‐encoded competence‐stimulating peptide (CSP). Upon CSP binding, the histidine kinase ComD activates ComE, its cognate response regulator, required for autoinduction of comCDE and for induction of the late competence genes. To understand better the early control of competence development, mutants upregulating comCDE (ComCDE UP ) were isolated using a comC – lacZ transcriptional fusion. Mutants were generated by polymerase chain reaction mutagenesis of the comCDE region and by in vitro transposon mutagenesis of the chromosome. Both types of ComCDE UP mutants exhibited similar phenotypes. They differed from wild type in displaying trypsin‐resistant transformation, competence under acid growth conditions and expression of comCDE under microaerobiosis; increased production of CSP in the mutants could account for the various phenotypes. The ComCDE UP transposon mutations included four independent insertions in the ciaR gene, which encodes the response regulator of a two‐component system previously found to affect competence, and two immediately upstream of the comAB operon. The latter two resulted in comAB overexpression, indicating that CSP export is rate limiting. Among comDE point mutations, a single amino acid change in ComD (T233I) conferred constitutive, CSP‐independent competence and resulted in comAB overexpression, providing support for the hypothesis that ComE regulates comAB; a ComE mutant (R120S) exhibited altered kinetics of competence shut‐off. Collectively, these data indicate that pheromone autoinduction, cross‐regulation of the comAB and comCDE operons and, possibly, competence shut‐off contribute to the early control of competence development in S. pneumoniae . They argue for a metabolic control of competence, mediated directly or indirectly by CiaR, and they suggest that both comAB and comCDE are potential targets for regulation.