z-logo
Premium
Binding of the purified integron DNA integrase IntI1 to integron‐ and cassette‐associated recombination sites
Author(s) -
Collis Christina M.,
Kim MiJurng,
Stokes H. W.,
Hall Ruth M.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
molecular microbiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.857
H-Index - 247
eISSN - 1365-2958
pISSN - 0950-382X
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00936.x
Subject(s) - integron , integrase , biology , recombination , recombinase , site specific recombination , flp frt recombination , binding site , plasmid , point mutation , dna , microbiology and biotechnology , homologous recombination , operon , gene , cre recombinase , genetics , genetic recombination , mutation , escherichia coli , transgene , genetically modified mouse
The site‐specific recombinase IntI1, encoded by class 1 integrons, catalyses the integration and excision of gene cassettes by recognizing two classes of sites, the integron‐associated attI1 site and the 59‐base element (59‐be) family of sites that are associated with gene cassettes. IntI1 includes the four conserved amino acids that are characteristic of members of the integrase family, and IntI1 proteins with single amino acid substitutions at each of these positions had substantially reduced catalytic activity, consistent with this classification. IntI1 was purified as a fusion protein and shown to bind to isolated attI1 or 59‐be recombination sites. Binding to attI1 was considerably stronger than to a 59‐be. Binding adjacent to the recombination cross‐over point was not detected. A strong IntI1 binding site within attI1 was localized by both deletion and footprinting analysis to a 14 bp region 24–37 bp to the left of the recombination cross‐over point, and this region is known to be critical for recombination in vivo (Recchia et al ., 1994). An imperfect (13/15) direct repeat of this region, located 41–55 bp to the left of the recombination cross‐over point, contains a weaker IntI1 binding site. Mutation of the stronger binding site showed that a single base pair change accounted for the difference in the strength of binding.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here