Premium
A test for deviation from island‐model population structure
Author(s) -
Porter Adam H.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
molecular ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.619
H-Index - 225
eISSN - 1365-294X
pISSN - 0962-1083
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01783.x
Subject(s) - biology , inbreeding , locus (genetics) , statistics , gene flow , null model , population genetics , null hypothesis , population , evolutionary biology , genetics , genetic variation , ecology , mathematics , gene , demography , sociology
The neutral island model forms the basis for several estimation models that relate patterns of genetic structure to microevolutionary processes. Estimates of gene flow are often based on this model and may be biased when the model's assumptions are violated. An appropriate test for violations is to compare F ST scores for individual loci to a null distribution based on the average F ST taken over multiple loci. A parametric bootstrap method is described here based on Wright's β‐distribution to generate null distributions of F ST for each locus. These null distributions account for error introduced by sampling populations, individuals and loci, and also biological sources of error, including variable alleles/locus and inbreeding. Confidence limits can be obtained directly from these distributions. Significant deviations from the island model may be the result of selection, deviations from the island model's migration pattern, nonequilibrium conditions, or other deviations from island‐model assumptions. Only strong biases are likely to be detected because of the inherently large sampling variation of F ST . Nevertheless, a coefficient, Nb , describing bias in the spread of the β‐distribution in units comparable to the gene flow parameter, Nm , can be obtained for each locus. In samples from populations of the butterfly Coenonympha tullia , the loci Idh‐1, Mdh‐1, Pgi and Pgm showed significantly lower F ST than expected.