Premium
Integrating human factors into the medical curriculum
Author(s) -
Glavin R J,
Maran N J
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
medical education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.776
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1365-2923
pISSN - 0308-0110
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2923.37.s1.5.x
Subject(s) - curriculum , human error , set (abstract data type) , medical education , psychology , patient safety , human resources , domain (mathematical analysis) , medicine , engineering ethics , computer science , risk analysis (engineering) , engineering , pedagogy , health care , management , political science , mathematical analysis , mathematics , law , economics , programming language
Background The study of human factors is a scientific discipline that deals with the interactions between human beings and the elements of a system. This is important because shortcomings in these areas, if unchecked, can result in adverse outcomes. Research into human factors in industries where safety is paramount has provided the basis of countermeasures against human error. Adverse outcomes in medicine resulting from human error exact a high cost in both patient suffering and financial outlay. CRM training One of the approaches used to minimise the effect of human error is to train people in a set of knowledge, skills and attitudes that underpin the domain‐specific competencies for that profession. These are referred to as non‐technical skills (NTS). In aviation, such an approach has been shown to be both translatable from the training environment to the workplace and effective in reducing adverse outcomes. Discussion Medicine has incorporated this style of training, usually centred around simulator‐based courses, but as yet in a piecemeal, episodic fashion which relies on participants volunteering to attend courses. Unlike other industries there is no systematic approach to linking the content of this teaching with the more conventional range of topics. As a consequence it is difficult to assess the impact of human factors training in medicine. This is partly because very little work has been done to date in identifying the key non‐technical skills required in medicine, and the overall experience of workplace based assessment is limited. Lessons from other high reliability organisations may help to address the main challenges of developing the content, integrating it into the curriculum, reinforcing the concepts in the workplace through staff development and establishing its role in summative assessment.