Premium
Does formal approval of educational courses guarantee quality?
Author(s) -
F Nicol,
Patterson Wm
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
medical education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.776
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1365-2923
pISSN - 0308-0110
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00297.x
Subject(s) - continuing medical education , medical education , quality (philosophy) , continuing education , medicine , formal education , psychology , pedagogy , philosophy , epistemology
Objectives To assess whether organizers of continuing medical education for general practitioners used principles of adult learning when designing their meetings. Design A questionnaire study of organizers of approved educational meetings for general medical practitioners (GPs). Setting South East Scotland Subjects Organizers of educational meetings. Results Organizers often failed to use principles of adult learning in the construction of their meetings. Organizers with prior training in medical education were, however, significantly more likely to adopt these principles. Conclusions Given concern about the quality of educational meetings as assessed by their educational impact, formal approval is not an indicator of quality. Postgraduate bodies should use explicit criteria both in the development and approval of continuing educational meetings.