Premium
Imprecise terms in UK medical multiple‐choice questions: what examiners think they mean
Author(s) -
Holsgrove Gareth,
Elzubeir Margaret
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
medical education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.776
H-Index - 138
eISSN - 1365-2923
pISSN - 0308-0110
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00203.x
Subject(s) - graduation (instrument) , multiple choice , variety (cybernetics) , quality assurance , quality (philosophy) , psychology , medline , medicine , medical education , statistics , mathematics , epistemology , law , pathology , significant difference , philosophy , external quality assessment , geometry , political science
Many multiple‐choice questions (MCQs) used in medical education in the UK contain undefined, imprecise terms. They are particularly common in true/false items and can be found in classroom tests, published examples of MCQs and, more importantly, in high‐stakes examinations which determine a candidate's graduation or membership of a professional body. This study investigated imprecise terms used in some MB BS finals examinations and the Part 1 Membership Examination of the Royal College of Physicians. It revealed that imprecise terms occur commonly, yet there is a wide range of opinion among the examiners themselves about their meanings. The numbers and variety of imprecise terms which were found in high‐stakes MCQ examinations are described in this paper and details are given concerning the lack of consensus about their meanings as reported by the responsible examiners. A second type of construction error – disproportionately large numbers of `true' branches – was also recorded. Exemplary practices do exist in MCQ quality assurance, but in the UK they are very much the exception rather than the rule. The findings of this investigation strongly indicate a need for change.