Premium
A behavioural test to assess daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnoea
Author(s) -
BENNETT L,
STRADLING J,
DAVIES R
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
journal of sleep research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.297
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1365-2869
pISSN - 0962-1105
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2869.1997.00039.x
Subject(s) - wakefulness , multiple sleep latency test , somnolence , polysomnography , excessive daytime sleepiness , medicine , sleep (system call) , audiology , epworth sleepiness scale , sleep stages , obstructive sleep apnea , physical therapy , psychology , apnea , anesthesia , sleep disorder , electroencephalography , insomnia , psychiatry , computer science , adverse effect , operating system
Daytime sleepiness is an important symptom of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS). The standard tests for its objective quantification use EEG recordings, and are time consuming and expensive, which makes them difficult to use for large studies. This study assesses the ability of a simple test of sustained ‘wakefulness’ to discriminate the excessive somnolence of severe symptomatic obstructive sleep apnoea from normality, and compares its results to the traditional EEG based Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT). Ten subjects (7 M 3F) with severe sleep apnoea (>4% SaO 2 dip rate median 32.7 (90% central range 9.7–65.6)) and symptoms of daytime sleepiness, (Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS)17(10–24)) and 10 normal subjects (4 M 6F, ESS 3.5(1–8)) were studied. The MWT and the behavioural test (Oxford SLEep Resistance test – OSLER test) were performed on each subject in random order on 2 separate days. The protocol for both tests was the same with 4 × 40 min sleep resistance challenges throughout the day while sound isolated in a darkened room. During the OSLER test subjects were asked to press a switch in response to a light emitting diode (LED), which was lit for 1 s in every three. Both the switch and the light were connected to a computer that stored both the number of times the light was illuminated and whether a correct response was made. The OSLER test discriminated the normal subjects from the sleep apnoea group (mean sleep latency (min) normal group 39.8, OSA group 10.5) as well as the traditional MWT (normal group 38.1, OSA group 7.3) and was much simpler to administer. This test has the advantage that sleep onset is defined objectively and automatically as a failure to respond to the light, rather than from EEG interpretation, which is inevitably partly subjective. This technique may provide a simple and robust method of objectively quantifying daytime sleepiness for large studies.