Premium
Paradigms for mental health nursing: fragmentation or integration?
Author(s) -
Chan Pa,
Rudman Mj
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.69
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1365-2850
pISSN - 1351-0126
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2850.1998.00114.x
Subject(s) - ideology , reductionism , nursing , credibility , mainstream , psychology , confusion , health care , dominance (genetics) , sociology , medicine , epistemology , political science , politics , law , psychoanalysis , philosophy , biochemistry , chemistry , gene
Debate about the best paradigm for mental health nursing is compounded by threats from mainstreaming and genericism. In nursing education, integrated practice may have been devalued in a matrix of reductionist disciplines. The ‘gendered’ nature of professional knowledge may create a schismatic and self‐defeating attitude in nurses. Conversely, nurses may be exhorted to adopt a ‘male’ paradigm in order to gain academic credibility, in which the caring dimension may be lost. Other polarities such as ideological distinctions between treatment in hospital and care in the community lead to conceptual confusion. These schisms in care are detrimental to both professionals and users. The writers argue that these tensions may be addressed in an ‘androgenous’ model which presents a challenge to both value systems, rejects the dominance of schismatic models, and offers the potential for a new professional integrity.