Premium
Buccal and lingual activity during mastication and swallowing in typical adults
Author(s) -
Casas M. J.,
Kenny D. J.,
Macmillan R. E.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of oral rehabilitation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.991
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1365-2842
pISSN - 0305-182X
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.00983.x
Subject(s) - mastication , swallowing , molar , electromyography , masticatory force , dentistry , medicine , orthodontics , masseter muscle , buccal administration , tongue , mandibular first molar , coronal plane , anatomy , physical medicine and rehabilitation , pathology
summary A non‐invasive protocol was developed to assess tongue and cheek movements during mastication and to evaluate the temporal relationship between mastication and the initiation of pharyngeal swallowing. Typical adults (three males and three females) were monitored during chewing. Miniature pressure transducers were bonded unilaterally to the buccal and lingual surfaces of the first mandibular molar and the buccal surface of the first maxillary molar on each subject's preferred chewing side. Surface electromyography of the ipsilateral masseter muscle was recorded as an indicator of jaw‐closing activity. Pressure and electromyography (EMG) recordings were time‐linked to simultaneous B‐mode ultrasound imaging of the oral cavity using a submental, coronal view aligned with the first mandibular molar. The intervals between peak pressure recorded at each pressure transducer and peak jaw‐closing activity for each masticatory cycle were not statistically different [analysis of variance ( anova ), P =0·9856] and displayed large statistical variation. These intervals were not different at the beginning of the trials (hard biscuit) than they were at the completion of mastication when the cookie had been broken down to a paste/puree consistency bolus. The interval between the last chewing stroke and the initiation of swallowing was 0·92 ± 0·34 s). No significant difference existed among subjects for this time interval ( anova , P =0·382).