Premium
Adhesive bonding of composite material to cast titanium with varying surface preparations
Author(s) -
Yanagida H.,
Matsumura H.,
Taira Y.,
Atsuta M.,
Shimoe S.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
journal of oral rehabilitation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.991
H-Index - 93
eISSN - 1365-2842
pISSN - 0305-182X
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00811.x
Subject(s) - primer (cosmetics) , materials science , adhesive , composite number , bond strength , composite material , titanium , alloy , opacity , metal , titanium alloy , adhesive bonding , metallurgy , chemistry , optics , physics , organic chemistry , layer (electronics)
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the surface preparation effects of eight metal conditioners and an adhesive system on bonding between a prosthodontic composite material and cast titanium. Eight primers designed for conditioning base metal alloys (Acryl Bond, All‐Bond 2 Primer B, Alloy Primer, Cesead II Opaque Primer, Eye Sight Opaque Primer, Metafast Bonding Liner, Metal Primer II, and MR Bond) as well as a surface modification technique (Siloc) were assessed. Disk specimens cast from titanium (T‐Alloy H) were either primed with one of the eight primers or treated with the Siloc system, and then bonded with a light‐activated composite material (Artglass). Bond durability was evaluated by thermocycling (4 and 60 °C, 1 min each, 20 000 cycles). After thermocycling, two groups either primed with the Cesead II Opaque Primer material or treated with the Siloc system exhibited significantly greater bond strength (20·0 and 19·0 MPa) than the other groups (0·2–12·6 MPa, P < 0·05). These two systems are considered to be useful for improving bonding between the titanium and the composite material tested.