Premium
Infusion devices: a bleeding vein of clinical negligence?
Author(s) -
Cath Quinn
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of nursing management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.925
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1365-2834
pISSN - 0966-0429
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2834.1998.00071.x
Subject(s) - medicine , patient safety , medical emergency , service (business) , agency (philosophy) , nursing , economic shortage , government (linguistics) , public relations , operations management , health care , business , engineering , marketing , philosophy , linguistics , political science , epistemology , economics , economic growth
Aim This article explores the impact of technology and potential clinical negligence claims on nursing practice. Background Sophisticated procedures and techniques have led to the development of many types of medical device. Many device functions have moved from being one of supporting clinical practice to that of being an integral requirement in treatment delivery. Clinical negligence claims against National Health Service (NHS) Trusts are also likely to spiral significantly over the next 5 years. The Medical Devices Agency cite inadequate training as a main contributing factor to the yearly increase in adverse incident reports they receive. It is these incidents that will potentially provide ‘rich pickings’ for the ever increasing litigation conscious Great British public, and their lawyers. Key issues The challenge for management is how can staff be trained when they are under pressure to maintain a service in the face of staff and skills shortages and increased activity. Conclusion Investment in training schemes that address and minimize the many areas of clinical negligence risk should be explored and introduced as a matter of urgency. The management of infusion systems and a training scheme which is designed to lead staff through a comprehensive competency based generic training in the use of infusion devices is discussed.