QT interval measurement: Q to T Apex or Q to T End ?

. Davey PP (John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, England, UK). QT interval measurement: Q to T Apex or Q to T End ? J Intern Med 1999; 246: 145–149. Objective. To study QT interval. QT interval is frequently measured, though there is variation in the literature as to whether it is more appropriate to measure from the Q wave to the apex of the T wave, which is methodologically easy, or to measure to the end of the T wave. Hypothesis. For Q–T Apex interval to be used as a measure of repolarization, the variability of the Q–T interval should lie in this early phase. This should be true in health and in disease, at rest and with physiological interventions such as exercise. If there is variability in the T Apex – T End interval, this should be reflected by the variability in the Q–T Apex interval. Methods. Fifty‐six subjects were recruited: 24 with heart failure, 16 with left ventricular hypertrophy and 16 controls. Q–T Apex , Q–T End and T Apex – T End intervals were measured at rest and on exercise. Results. Q–TApex intervals at rest were not different amongst the three groups studied, being 339 ± 7 ms for controls, 341 ± 6 ms in left ventricular hypertrophy and 351 ± 6 ms in heart failure. The Q–T End interval at rest was 421 ± 6 ms in controls, 420 ± 6 ms in hypertrophy and 461 ± 9 ms in failure ( P  < 0.05 for failure versus hypertrophy or control). Thus the T Apex – T End interval was prolonged in heart failure at rest. However, at peak exercise there was no difference between the T Apex – T End intervals in the different groups. Variability in the T Apex – T End interval induced by disease or by exercise was not related to variability in the Q–T Apex interval. Conclusion. Q–TEnd rather than Q–T Apex should be used when Q–T interval measurement is required.