Premium
The accuracy of peripheral skeletal assessment at the radius in estimating femoral bone density as measured by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry: a comparative study of single‐photon absorptiometry and computed tomography
Author(s) -
BOONEN S.,
CHENG X.,
NICHOLSON P. H. F.,
VERBEKE G.,
BROOS P.,
DEQUEKER J.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
journal of internal medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.625
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1365-2796
pISSN - 0954-6820
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2796.1997.00242.x
Subject(s) - quantitative computed tomography , medicine , femoral neck , bone mineral , densitometry , bone density , dual energy x ray absorptiometry , nuclear medicine , osteoporosis , femur , trochanter , radiology , surgery
Boonen S, Cheng X, Nicholson PHF, Verbeke G, Broos P, Dequeker J (Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium). The accuracy of peripheral skeletal assessment at the radius in estimating femoral bone density as measured by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry: a comparative study of single‐photon absorptiometry and computed tomography. J Intern Med 1997; 242 : 323–8. Objectives One of the latest developments in bone densitometry is peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT), a method which allows the separate determination of cortical and trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) in the peripheral skeleton. This study was designed to compare the relative abilities of single‐photon absorptiometry (SPA) and pQCT to reflect BMD of the proximal femur as measured by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA), an established predictor of osteoporotic hip fracture risk. Design Cross‐sectional study. Subjects A well‐defined community‐based sample of 129 skeletally healthy women aged 70–87 years. Measurements Radial BMD by SPA and pQCT and femoral BMD by DXA. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed relating the DXA measurements at the femoral neck and the trochanteric region with the values of SPA and pQCT. Results Approximately 38% of the variance in femoral neck BMD could be explained by BMD of the midradius assessed by SPA, in contrast to only 18–27% by pQCT. At the trochanter, 32% of BMD could be predicted by SPA as compared to 19–26% by pQCT. Moreover, according to multiple regression, prediction of femoral BMD by SPA was not enhanced by performing pQCT. Conclusions Radial pQCT has little value as a screening tool to identify elderly women with low femoral BMD. Additional research is needed to determine whether or not pQCT will enhance fracture prediction beyond that obtainable from a density measurement by SPA.