Premium
Spatio‐temporal patterns of mink and muskrat in Canada during a quarter century
Author(s) -
Viljugrein Hildegunn,
Lingjærde Ole CHR.,
Stenseth Nils CHR.,
Boyce Mark S.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal of animal ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.134
H-Index - 157
eISSN - 1365-2656
pISSN - 0021-8790
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00526.x
Subject(s) - mink , bay , american mink , geography , taiga , ecology , boreal , predation , abundance (ecology) , donkey , predator , biology , archaeology
Summary1 Fur‐return data on muskrat ( Ondatra zibethicus ) and mink ( Mustela vison ) from 80 posts of the Hudson’s Bay Company were analysed. From each post we obtained the number of furs bought from trappers during 25 years (1925–49). 2 The ecological information content of the data was assessed using questionnaires sent to each post. We conclude that fur‐return data reflect relative abundance of muskrat and mink, and not primarily information about the trappers. 3 The most‐common temporal pattern of the two species are cycles with a period of 8–9 years, with muskrat cycling 1–2 years ahead of the mink. This pattern, as would be expected in a typical predator–prey relationship, is found throughout the boreal forest region, with the exception of several posts in eastern Canada. In the eastern region, the two species were found to fluctuate in synchrony. 4 The data show broad‐scale synchrony. Peaks (and troughs) are roughly aligned in phase over the entire Canadian boreal forest. 5 In some areas the phase of the cycle is either ahead or behind the average cycle. Peaks (and troughs) of mink and muskrat cycles generally appear first in the Athabasca Basin region (for mink in the Hudson’s Bay region of Manitoba and Ontario) and from this epicentre spread throughout Canada within 2–3 years. 6 Synchrony (i.e. mean correlation) declines with distance; for distances less than 450 km, similarity among populations is higher than the average.