Clinical supervision, death, Heidegger and Freud come ‘out of the sighs’

Clinical supervision, death, Heidegger and Freud come ‘out of the sighs’ In his recent paper on clinical supervision, ‘Out of the sighs’— an existential‐phenomenological method of clinical supervision: the contribution to palliative care’, in this journal, Jones weds psychoanalytical ideas with Heidegger’s existential‐phenomenological concepts to provide a theoretical framework for clinical supervision in palliative nursing. Although this is an interesting undertaking, theoretical diversity is not a simple matter of merely interchanging concepts. Rather, it is a complex process that must account for varying philosophical assumptions upon which any theory attempts to explain or understand reality. This paper examines the major themes identified by Jones. In particular, it focuses on the spirit of ontological hermeneutics and psychoanalysis, represented by their respective founders, Heidegger and Freud, and in general, refers to other thinkers and ideas mentioned by Jones — as for instance, Schön’s reflective practice, Polanyi’s personal commitment, Husserl’s lived experience, Schutz’s intersubjectivity and Yalom’s existential disidentification. Here, discussion concerns the subject‐object polarity. The paper argues that many of these philosophies are incompatible. In particular, psychoanalysis and existentialism imply inconsistent aims in that psychology does not equate with fundamental ontology — and Jones has not adequately distinguished between these in his supervision discourse. The implications of the accompanying conceptual problems for the practice of clinical supervision in palliative nursing are exemplified by Jones’s case study of Lindsey, a dying patient.