z-logo
Premium
Review of nursing documentation in nursing home wards — changes after intervention for individualized care
Author(s) -
Hansebo Görels,
Kihlgren Mona,
Ljunggren Gunnar
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
journal of advanced nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.948
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1365-2648
pISSN - 0309-2402
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01034.x
Subject(s) - documentation , nursing , medicine , nursing care , intervention (counseling) , nursing process , nursing outcomes classification , primary nursing , quality (philosophy) , team nursing , nursing research , nurse education , philosophy , epistemology , computer science , programming language
Review of nursing documentation in nursing home wards — changes after intervention for individualized care Using standardized assessment instruments may help staff identify needs, problems and resources which could be a basis for nursing care, and facilitate and improve the quality of documentation. The Resident Assessment Instrument/Minimum Data Set (RAI/MDS) especially developed for the care of elderly people, was used as a basis for individualized and documented nursing care. This study was carried out to compare nursing documentation in three nursing home wards in Sweden, before and after a one‐year period of supervised intervention. The review of documentation focused on structure and content in both nursing care plans and daily notes. The greatest change seen after intervention was the writing of care plans for the individual patients. Daily notes increased both in total and within parts of the nursing process used, but reflected mostly temporary situations. Even though the documentation of nursing care increased the most, it was the theme medical treatment which was the most extensive overall. A difference was seen between computer‐triggered Resident Assessment Protocol (RAP) items, obtained from the RAI/MDS assessments, and items in the nursing care plans; the former could be regarded as a means of quality assurance and of making staff aware of the need for further discussions. The RAI/MDS instrument seems to be a useful tool for the dynamic process in nursing care delivered and as a basis for documentation. The documentation should communicate a patient’s situation and progress, and if staff are to be able to use it in their everyday nursing care activity, it must be well‐structured and freely available. The importance of continuing education and supervision in nursing documentation for development of a reliable source of information was confirmed by the present study.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here