Premium
Story telling: is it really research?
Author(s) -
Koch Tina
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of advanced nursing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.948
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1365-2648
pISSN - 0309-2402
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00853.x
Subject(s) - rigour , reflexivity , journaling file system , active listening , epistemology , product (mathematics) , sociology , hermeneutics , legitimacy , psychology , computer science , social science , politics , political science , law , philosophy , data file , geometry , mathematics , communication , database
Story telling: is it really research? ¶ In this paper I will suggest ways in which you may consider a story as a legitimate research product. I view the story as interpreted work communicated through writing as the research product. ‘Doing’ interpretive research is not an easy option in research. In this paper I will focus upon some of the complexities in creating an acceptable and accessible research product. I will cover five interrelated areas: journaling, observing, listening, writing and rigour. The term ‘research product’ refers to the outcome of the research process. By that I mean the dissertation, the research report or the published article. The notion of legitimacy is informed by Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics which does not show us what to do, but asks us to question what is ‘going on’ while researching. In this paper I ask you to consider the entire research process as a reflexive exercise which provides answers to the question: ‘What is going on in methods?’. I claim that if the research product is well sign‐posted, the readers will be able to travel easily through the worlds of the participants and makers of the story and decide for themselves whether the story is a legitimate research endeavour.