Premium
Bacterial leakage versus dye leakage in obturated root canals
Author(s) -
Barthel C. R.,
Moshonov J.,
Shuping G.,
Òrstavik D.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
international endodontic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.988
H-Index - 119
eISSN - 1365-2591
pISSN - 0143-2885
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00235.x
Subject(s) - root canal , dentistry , leakage (economics) , materials science , coronal plane , significant difference , gutta percha , medicine , anatomy , economics , macroeconomics
Aim The aim of this study was to compare in vitro bacterial and dye leakage tests, commonly used to determine the seal of root canal fillings. Methodology Ninety‐six single‐rooted teeth had their crowns removed at the cemento‐enamel junction and their roots instrumented to ISO size 60 within 1 mm of the apex. Three groups of 30 roots were obturated by lateral condensation using gutta‐percha and one or other of the sealers, AH26, Ketac Endo, or Roth's 801 sealer. Three roots were used as negative controls and three roots as positive controls. The roots were then exposed at their coronal end first for 38 days to soy broth containing Staphylococcusepidermidis and thereafter for 48 h to basic fuchsin. Bacterial leakage was recorded when the challenging organism could be recovered from the apical end. Dye leakage was checked by microscopy of transverse sections of the apical tip at the end of the experiment. Results For the bacterial experiment, there was no significant difference amongst the three sealer groups. The dye experiment showed significantly greater leakage in the AH26 compared to the Ketac Endo group. No correlation between the results of the two tests could be seen. Conclusions The results of this study suggest that the molecular size of the penetrating agent may not be the relevant parameter when attempting to determine an appropriate test for the sealability of root canal fillings.