z-logo
Premium
Opposing roles of activator protein‐1 and CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β in the regulation of inducible granulysin gene expression in a human monocytic cell line, THP‐1
Author(s) -
Kida Yutaka,
Shimizu Takashi,
Kuwano Koichi
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
immunology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.297
H-Index - 133
eISSN - 1365-2567
pISSN - 0019-2805
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2567.2002.01524.x
Subject(s) - microbiology and biotechnology , biology , activator (genetics) , ccaat enhancer binding proteins , enhancer , transcription factor , reporter gene , caat box , electrophoretic mobility shift assay , binding site , transactivation , gene expression , promoter , response element , gene , transfection , regulation of gene expression , transcription (linguistics) , nuclear protein , biochemistry , linguistics , philosophy
Summary We previously reported that inducible granulysin gene expression in a human monocytic cell line, THP‐1 is dominantly dependent on transcription factor activator protein‐1 (AP‐1). Here, we further examined the precise regulatory mechanisms underlying granulysin gene expression using THP‐1 cells treated with Acholeplasma laidlawii . Transfection of reporter gene constructs into THP‐1 cells indicated that the presence of a positive regulatory element(s) is located from −329 to −85 base pairs, containing two distinct AP‐1 binding sites and one nuclear factor‐κB (NF‐κB) binding site. Deletion or mutation of the NF‐κB binding site failed to affect inducible promoter activity, whereas deletion or mutation of both the AP‐1 binding sites abrogated the promoter activity. Interestingly, deletion of the putative CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β (C/EBPβ) binding site upstream of the positive regulatory element induced the augmentation of granulysin promoter activity. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrated that nuclear extract prepared from A. laidlawii‐ treated THP‐1 cells generated a specific binding to oligonucleotides, including AP‐1, C/EBPβ, and NF‐κB element. Furthermore, over‐expression of liver‐enriched transcriptional activator protein, a subunit of C/EBPβ, augmented A. laidlawii ‐induced granulysin promoter activity, whereas over‐expression of liver‐enriched transcriptional inhibitory protein inhibited the promoter activity. NF‐κB p50 homodimer had no transactivation property, although it bound to the NF‐κB site. These results indicate that AP‐1 and C/EBPβ, but not NF‐κB participate in the regulation of inducible granulysin gene expression in THP‐1 cells. Moreover, the Toll‐like receptor 2‐dependent signalling pathway may be involved in A. laidlawii ‐induced transactivation of the granulysin promoter. Thus, these results suggest that the gene expression of granulysin in macrophages would be exquisitely regulated by positive and negative transcription factors when microbial invasion occurs.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here