z-logo
Premium
Training as a vehicle to empower carers in the community: more than a question of information sharing
Author(s) -
Clarke Nicholas
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
health and social care in the community
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.984
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1365-2524
pISSN - 0966-0410
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2001.00284.x
Subject(s) - empowerment , competence (human resources) , psychology , context (archaeology) , agency (philosophy) , attendance , public relations , social psychology , nursing , political science , medicine , sociology , paleontology , social science , law , biology
Much confusion still surrounds the concept of empowerment and how it is to be translated into practice within the context of community care for service users and carers. A major limitation has been the tendency to treat empowerment as synonymous with participation in decision‐making with little attention given to the ‘ecological’ model of empowerment where linkages have been found between community participation and measures of psychological empowerment. Training has been suggested as a means through which carers might become empowered , yet to date little empirical evidence has appeared within the literature to support this proposition. This study investigated whether attendance on a training programme to empower carers resulted in improvements in carers’ levels of perceived control, self‐efficacy and self‐esteem as partial measures of psychological empowerment. The findings demonstrated that whereas carers’ knowledge of services and participation increased as a result of the programme, no changes were found in measures of carer empowerment. The failure to consider how training needs to be designed in order to achieve changes in individual competence and self‐agency are suggested as the most likely explanation for the lack of change observed in carers’ psychological empowerment. It is suggested that community care agencies should focus greater energies in determining how the policy objectives of empowerment are to be achieved through training, and in so doing make far more explicit the supposed linkages between training content, design, and its posited impact on individual behaviour or self‐agency.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here