Premium
Continuing health care: the local development of policies and eligibility criteria
Author(s) -
Lewis Helen,
Wistow Gerald,
Abbott Stephen,
Cotterill Lesley
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
health and social care in the community
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.984
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1365-2524
pISSN - 0966-0410
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2524.1999.00213.x
Subject(s) - consistency (knowledge bases) , equity (law) , health care , health policy , service (business) , mental health , public relations , medicine , business , public administration , nursing , political science , public health , law , marketing , geometry , mathematics , psychiatry
In 1995 the Department of Health issued guidance on continuing health care following the health service commissioner’s finding against Leeds Health Authority for failing to provide long‐term care. Under this guidance, health authorities were required to agree continuing health care policies and eligibility criteria with fundholders and local authorities. This study sought to investigate the extent to which the drafting of local policies and criteria, within the framework of national guidance, led to consistency between health authorities. A structured content analysis was conducted of all the policies and eligibility criteria in three regions. In particular, it aimed to establish the comprehensiveness of local policies, the nature of local criteria, the consistency of each between authorities and with the guidance, the development of plans for reinvestment and the balance between institutional and domiciliary services. Only a minority of authorities were found to have identified investments in services, notwithstanding the requirement to do so in the guidance. In addition, most documents were not comprehensive in their coverage of client groups, with more information being provided about services for older people and those with mental health problems. Few policies contained action plans to translate general intentions about equity and consistency into practice. Eligibility criteria frequently took the form of descriptions of services and/or were so general that they would be difficult to apply in individual cases. Most documents contained no criteria for community health services. Whilst just over half of them included the aim of moving resources from acute to community sectors, they contained far more detail about institutionally based services and, for a number of reasons, appeared likely to reinforce the imbalance towards the latter. The documents analysed were part of an evolutionary process of understanding the contribution of effective continuing care to managing pressures on acute beds. Their impact on patients and their families must, however, await the findings from subsequent stages of this research.