z-logo
Premium
Yield response of long‐term mixed grassland swards and nutrient cycling under different nutrient sources and management regimes
Author(s) -
Griffin T.,
Giberson E.,
Wiedenhoeft M.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
grass and forage science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.716
H-Index - 56
eISSN - 1365-2494
pISSN - 0142-5242
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2494.2002.00325.x
Subject(s) - fertilizer , nutrient , agronomy , forage , manure , nutrient management , phosphorus , dry matter , grassland , nutrient cycle , cycling , environmental science , zoology , biology , chemistry , ecology , organic chemistry , history , archaeology
The response of a long‐term, mixed‐species hayfield in Maine, USA, to commercial fertilizers and liquid dairy manure was evaluated over a 6‐year period, including the effects on yield, nutrient concentration and cycling, forage species composition and soil nutrient levels. Nutrient treatments included an unamended control, N fertilizer, NPK fertilizer and liquid dairy manure (LDM). The application rates of plant‐available N, P, and K were constant across treatments. Application of nutrients in any form increased forage yield, generally by 2–4 t dry matter (DM) ha −1  year −1 . Yield from NPK fertilizer was 0·05–0·25 higher than from LDM, due to differences in N availability. Yield responses to P and K were minimal and there appeared to be no difference between P and K in fertilizer and manure. The forage sward became increasingly dominated by grass species as the experiment progressed; application of P and K in fertilizer or LDM allowed Agropyron repens to increase at the expense of Poa pratensis . Forage nutrient removal accounted for all applied N and K, and nearly all applied P, throughout the study period, demonstrating the important role these forages can play in whole‐farm nutrient management.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here