Premium
Are old forests underestimated as global carbon sinks?
Author(s) -
Carey Eileen V.,
Sala Anna,
Keane Robert,
Callaway Ragan M.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
global change biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.146
H-Index - 255
eISSN - 1365-2486
pISSN - 1354-1013
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00418.x
Subject(s) - carbon sink , primary production , environmental science , carbon cycle , temperate rainforest , carbon fibers , ecology , productivity , sink (geography) , temperate climate , carbon sequestration , atmospheric sciences , carbon flux , physical geography , ecosystem , geography , carbon dioxide , biology , mathematics , geology , macroeconomics , cartography , algorithm , composite number , economics
Summary Old forests are important carbon pools, but are thought to be insignificant as current atmospheric carbon sinks. This perception is based on the assumption that changes in productivity with age in complex, multiaged, multispecies natural forests can be modelled simply as scaled‐up versions of individual trees or even‐aged stands. This assumption was tested by measuring the net primary productivity (NPP) of natural subalpine forests in the Northern Rocky Mountains, where NPP is from 50% to 100% higher than predicted by a model of an even‐age forest composed of a single species. If process‐based terrestrial carbon models underestimate NPP by 50% in just one quarter of the temperate coniferous forests throughout the world, then global NPP is being underestimated by 145 Tg of carbon annually. This is equivalent to 4.3–7.6% of the missing atmospheric carbon sink. These results emphasize the need to account for multiple‐aged, species‐diverse, mature forests in models of terrestrial carbon dynamics to approximate the global carbon budget.