Premium
Survival of colour‐polymorphic Eristalis arbustorum hoverflies in semi‐field conditions
Author(s) -
Ottenheim M. M.,
Wertheim B.,
Holloway G. J.,
Brakefield P. M.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
functional ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.272
H-Index - 154
eISSN - 1365-2435
pISSN - 0269-8463
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00284.x
Subject(s) - biology , phenotypic plasticity , mimicry , population , ecology , zoology , wing , experimental evolution , demography , sociology , engineering , aerospace engineering , biochemistry , gene
1. The theory on adaptive phenotypic plasticity assumes different fitness optima in different environments. To demonstrate these fitness differences in the field or under laboratory conditions can be difficult. 2. The size of the coloured patches on the abdomen of Eristalis arbustorum varies with rearing temperature. At low temperatures small patches develop and at higher temperatures larger patches develop. Consequently, the colour patch size varies seasonally. 3. To study the relative fitness of two extreme phenotypes in abdominal coloration in the summer, a total of 591 laboratory‐reared flies were released in six large population cages. As a measure of fitness, survival was estimated. 4. In all replicate cages the survival of the pale phenotypes was higher than that of the dark phenotypes, indicating a higher fitness for the pale flies under summer conditions. 5. The fat content of flies reared under identical conditions to those released in the cages was measured. Pale flies had ≈ 0·7 mg more fat than dark flies (± 25% extra fat). However, it is argued that this difference in fat reserves could not have been the only cause of the observed difference in survival. 6. The results are discussed in relation to mimicry and thermoregulation.